Report verification

Verified before release.

Independent pre-release review of construction-materials field and laboratory reports. Drafts in; a concise exception list out — before signature and issue.

Works with your existing reports No LIMS migration NDA on request Files deleted after review
Process

Three steps. Nothing to install.

ReleaseEdge operates alongside the reports you already produce — Word, Excel, or a legacy LIMS. No integration, no migration.

01 — SUBMIT

Send five reports

Draft field or laboratory reports, in any format you already export.

02 — REVIEW

Receive an exception list

Findings are itemised and located: chronology, identifiers, units, required fields, references, consistency, arithmetic.

03 — RESOLVE

Release with assurance

Your reviewer addresses only material findings. Signature and issue remain with your engineer.

Scope of review

The defects that cause reissues.

  • Chronology — test and report dates; turnaround limits.
  • Identifiers — sample numbering, duplication, cross-references.
  • Metadata — units of measure; mandatory fields.
  • References — method and standard citations.
  • Consistency — narrative against reported values.
  • Computation — averages, tolerances, revision control.
Request a review

Begin with five reports.

We will review five of your reports at no cost and return the exception list. An NDA is available on request, and all files are deleted after review.

Prefer email — [email protected]

We respond to every request. NDA on request; files deleted after review.
Details

Common questions.

Is this an approval?

No. ReleaseEdge is an internal QA aid. Responsibility for the issued report remains with your engineer; we identify objective, mechanical defects only.

Does it replace our LIMS?

No. It works with the reports you already produce. Nothing is installed and no migration is required.

How is confidentiality handled?

An NDA is available on request, and files are deleted after review. You may begin with a redacted report.

How is pricing structured?

The initial five reports are complimentary. Ongoing arrangements are agreed once you have reviewed the output.

Worked example

Exception list

An illustrative review of three reports. Client and project identifiers are withheld; each finding is itemised by category and located for the reviewer.

Severity — High: correct before issue  ·  Medium: correct before release  ·  Low: housekeeping

R-1042
Concrete cylinder — compressive strength
Clear
ASTM C39  ·  tested 8 Sep 2026  ·  reported 10 Sep 2026  ·  sample CONC-118
No findings.
R-1043
Concrete cylinder — compressive strength
7 findings
ASTM C39  ·  tested 12 Sep 2026  ·  reported 12 Sep 2026  ·  sample conc_22
CategoryFindingSeverity
ComputationResult “4,5oo” is not numeric.High
ReferencesNo method or standard reference is present.High
ComputationStated average 4,800 disagrees with computed 4,533.33.High
IdentifiersSample identifier does not follow the project convention.Medium
ConsistencyNarrative does not cite the sample identifier.Medium
PersonnelTechnician credential is not recorded.Medium
RevisionRevision control is not recorded.Low
R-1044
Soil — in-place density
1 finding
ASTM D6938  ·  tested 1 Sep 2026  ·  reported 22 Sep 2026  ·  sample SOIL-204
CategoryFindingSeverity
ChronologyTurnaround of 21 days exceeds the 10-day limit.Medium

ReleaseEdge is an internal QA aid. It is not an approval, and the issued report remains the responsibility of the issuing firm.

Request received

Thank you. We will respond shortly with secure submission instructions. An NDA is available on request, and all files are deleted after review.

Return to ReleaseEdge